Genetics Or Environment?
The debate rages on; is autism an inherited (genetic) condition or is it caused primarly by environmental factors?
A recent study in California looked at sets of twins with autism. The researchers looked at both identical twins and fraternal twins (non-identical). In identical twins the DNA is identical between the twins, whereas in fraternal twins only half the DNA is shared.
If autism was primary a genetic condition then one would expect identical twins, who have identical DNA, to both be autistic whilst fraternal twins would have a much lower ratio of autistic to non-autistic twin.
Conversely if autism was primarily an environmental condition then one would expect the fraternal twins and identical twins to have similar ratio of autistic to non-autistic twins.
What the researchers found was that there appeared to be a significant genetic contribution to whether both twins would be autistic; however there was a greater environmental component in determining if both twins were autistic. based on their findings the authors calculate that
shared environment accounts for 55% of the risk of autism and 37% for genetic heritability.
There’s an abstract of the report in the Archives of General Psychiatry or, if you’d like to read a fuller discussion, please see Genetic Heritability and Shared Environmental Factors Among Twin Pairs With Autism on Left Brain Right Brain.
Autism study downplays genetics
Just when I thought I understood along comes a study that throws some doubt on genetics being the primary factor in determining autism.
Let us know what you think.
Autism study downplays genetics as primary cause – American Medical News.